The War Against Iraq essays

The War Against Iraq essays Many say that the Bush Administration is justified in its attempts to wage war against Iraq. Citizens that believe in this course of action should stop and examine some of the finer details. After the conflict in Afghanistan our government shifted its attention to Iraq in its search for weapons of mass destruction. Simply because Iraq has the capability to one-day produce nuclear arms is not justification for a preemptive attack from the U.S. Countries across the globe and the majority of the U.N. opposes the U.S.s proposal of a preemptive attack on Iraq simply because the country could one day threaten freedom. Iraq has shown no signs of aggression towards the U.S. that merits military actions. Another point that was brought up a former U.N. weapons inspector was that Iraq no longer poses a threat to the U.S. in any way. If our government proceeds with its plans to invade Iraq our efforts to eliminate terrorist threats in other countries would be useless due to the overwhelming w orld-wide disapproval of our governments actions involving Iraq. Also our already-troubled economy would suffer due to the amount of resources needed for a war against Saddam. A preemptive strike against a non-aggressive country is not only immoral but is illegal. The Bush Administration claims that they are enforcing the will of the security council by attacking Iraq, but also state that they are willing to defy the council to attack Saddam. The few remaining government officials that have experience in war almost all agree that out nations method of handling this situation is not taking into account the bigger picture. One major flaw in the plan for an attack on Iraq is that Saddam has not threatened the U.S. in any way. This alone is enough reason for us to rethink our plans. Other countries like North Korea who actually possess nuclear arms and have shown signs of willingness to use them seem a much more ...