Assess the view that in todays society the family

Assess the view that in todays ships company the family is losing its functions (24 Marks) According to functionalists the family has lost its functions, functionalism claim on that point is integration and harmony between different parts of beau monde which rely upon each other to watch a cooperating society. Functionalists view the family as vital organs in chief(prenominal)taining society, functionalism concentrates on the contri andion of the family towards society and how the family fits with other social institutions to create and efficient society.Functionalists like Murdock argues that the family has four main unctions re output signal as the family provides some stability for the reproduction and rearing of children, economic as the family provides for the family in terms of food and shelter, sexual and socialisation. Murdock regards these functions as demand in any society he suggests the nuclear family was found in every society that it is not the only form of arr angement that can carry these functions out.For functionalists the family fulfils a number of important functions for individuals and society much(prenominal) as the socialisation of children and the stabilization of adult ersonalities Functionalists like Parsons and Dennis argue that in contemporary society many of the functions performed by the family and pre industrialised society has been removed from the family. Many argue that these functions are being taken over by other institutions and that these have been transferred to other institutions for example the NHS as well as the grooming and offbeat system.Parsons refers to this as structural differentiation and he also claimed that is process has meant that modern more specialise families now only have two main basic needs Primary socialisation of children and stabilisation of adult personalities. However many sociologists argue against claims made my Parsons and Dennis, some argue that the family has not lost its functio ns. Fletcher and Shorter 1966 abnegate that the family has lost its functions in contemporary society.They suggest that during pre industrial and early industrial society poverty meant that functions such as welfare and education were not effectively carried out. Children were a lot neglected and male peasants didnt care for their wives just now more about their animals. Fletchers argues that the family has now more note fewer functions placed on it for example the ealth and welfare functions of the family have been strengthened by welfare landed estate and parents now are more preoccupied with their childrens health.Social operate with their powers now intervene in family cases if there are reports or suspicions of child neglect and this has increased the responsibilities of parents kind of than discouraging them. Feminism however disagrees with the view that the family has lost its economic spot of a unit of production and argue that it has become a unit of consumption. They also majority of home defecate is productive but it not recognised as uch because it is unpaid and usually done by women. They argue that the economic component part made by women is underestimated.Radical feminist Christine Delphine and Dianna Leonard 1992 argues that some functions of production have been lost but others are pretormed to a higher standard than the past tor example washing, ironing and cleaning as family life is much little stable than it was in the past. A traditional function of the family is the reproduction and nurturing of children being seen as the main reason for marriage as a means of passing on family property and roviding a proximo workforce. However this has changed as there has been an increase in the number of people having sexual relations sooner marriage and out of marriage.Another traditional function of the family was industrialisation and the growth of factory production in Britain, the family was a unit of production which meant the family home was also a work place. Children would learn the skills needed for life from their elders and they often followed their parents footsteps in life. However this has changed as well as since the 19th century work has moved impertinent he home to factories and offices. Families no longer produce the goods they need they go out instead to work and earn wages to but the goods.These skills needed can no longer be learnt from the family but quite an in a place of work or education. Occupations are less likely to be achieved by kinship but instead by individual merits. Lastly the family traditionally played an important role in caring for children however before the twentieth century most children were poorly looked after imputable to poverty. This has now changed as the modern family gets more help in caring for children hrough a range of state welfare services and growing numbers of care services such as play groups and nurseries.All the writers die hard to think in terms of the fa mily without differentiating between different family types. Graham Allan and Graham Crow 2001 argue that attempts to see the functions of the family can be criticised because of the functionalist one size fits approach. Postmodernists and different feminists reject this view that there is one atomic number 53 family type which always performs certain functions. This makes it difficult to measure functions of society.